Movie Mahal

An online film journal for Indian Cinema

ACE IN THE HOLE / THE BIG CARNIVAL (Dir. Billy Wilder, 1951, US) – Rotten to the Core

Wilder’s satire is as caustic as they come. Human depravity was extenuated with a memorable accent in Wilder’s 1944 classic noir Double Indemnity by the scheming Phyllis Dietrichson. ‘We’re both rotten’ she tells the doomed Walter Neff, only his response is more telling ‘Only you’re a little more rotten’. The corruption of an ideal is aptly demonstrated by such a metaphor – rotten souls, rotten people and rotten dreams are some of the charges levied at the grotesque journalist Chuck Tatum (Kirk Douglas). It’s not surprising Wilder’s 1951 treatise on the American news media was a critical and commercial failure considering the prescient tone struck by the insidious fabrication and duplicitous manufacturing of news. Tatum like Neff is a victim of hubris but unlike Neff’s death march Tatum’s descent is a venomous trajectory of egotistical excess which offends and polarises all those around him. Wilder paints a picture of American society that is inherently unsympathetic. The parasitic hunger for sensationalising personal tragedy is sustained primarily through an ending in which imagery of rampant exploitation and prostitution is galvanised by Tatum’s dying words ‘You can have me for nothing’ he says pathetically before he drops down dead in a heap. It is a savage denouement and one that cuts deep:

Advertisements

3 comments on “ACE IN THE HOLE / THE BIG CARNIVAL (Dir. Billy Wilder, 1951, US) – Rotten to the Core

  1. Shubhajit
    May 19, 2011

    One of my favourite movies, one of the greatest film noirs, one of Wilder Wilder's finest works, and one of Kirk Douglas' best performances – yeah, I guess that's Ace in the Hole for us. 🙂

    Wilder, as you said, literally filled every frame with acid and vitriol, and painted one of the darkest portraits of rottenness. The film, with its acerbic and devastating blow on yellow journalism, can really make even the most hard-hearted people wince – that's the kind of power it still wields!

    Like

  2. Shubhajit
    May 19, 2011

    Though, when it comes to brilliant & unforgettable jabs against the degradation of the wonderful profession of journalism, and also in terms of purely cinematic value, I guess I'd put Sweet Smell of Success slightly ahead of Ace in the Hole. What would your order of preference be?

    Like

  3. Omar Ahmed
    May 20, 2011

    I don't know, it's a tricky one. Whilst Sweet Smell of Success has the edge in terms of performance, dialogue and cinematography, Wilder's noirish diversion has a stronger ending, so overall I would probably agree Lancaster and Curtis would come ahead but just slightly.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on May 18, 2011 by in Auteur, Billy Wilder, Hollywood Cinema, Kirk Douglas, Media, Noir, Political Cinema.

OMAR AHMED

PhD Researcher (Indian Parallel Cinema), The University of Manchester (AHRC 2015).

Teacher of Film & Media.
Freelance Writer & Cinephile.

Contact:
oahmed5@gmail.com

STUDYING INDIAN CINEMA (Auteur, 2015)

DIRECTORY OF WORLD CINEMA: INDIA (2015)

Archives

%d bloggers like this: